Last edited by Arami
Saturday, July 18, 2020 | History

3 edition of Interagency Review Group on Nuclear Waste Management found in the catalog.

Interagency Review Group on Nuclear Waste Management

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs. Subcommittee on Energy and the Environment.

Interagency Review Group on Nuclear Waste Management

oversight hearing before the Subcommittee on Energy and the Environment of the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs, House of Representatives, Ninety-fifth Congress, second session ... July 11, 1978

by United States. Congress. House. Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs. Subcommittee on Energy and the Environment.

  • 289 Want to read
  • 15 Currently reading

Published by U.S. Govt. Print. Off. in Washington .
Written in English

    Subjects:
  • United States. -- Interagency Review Group on Nuclear Waste Management,
  • Radioactive waste disposal -- United States

  • Edition Notes

    Includes bibliographical references

    SeriesSerial - House, Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs ; no. 95-35
    The Physical Object
    Paginationiii, 158 p. :
    Number of Pages158
    ID Numbers
    Open LibraryOL14185323M

    1. A new, consent-based approach to siting future nuclear waste management facilities. 2. A new organization dedicated solely to implementing the waste management program and empowered with the authority and resources to succeed. 3. Access to the funds nuclear utility ratepayers are providing for the purpose of nuclear waste management. Size: KB. Forthcoming, Environmental Law and Policy Review () Solving the US Nuclear Waste Dilemma Richard B. Stewart1 I. Introduction Current U.S. nuclear waste law and policy is bankrupt. The Nuclear Waste Management Act (NWPA) set a deadline for opening a deep geologic repository to receive spent nuclear.

    Radioactive Waste Management This is a Wikipedia book, a collection of Wikipedia articles that can be easily saved, imported by an external electronic rendering service, and ordered as . the nuclear power industry eventually led the industry and the federal government to press for a legislative solution. C. The Carter Interagency Review .

    nuclear waste disposal • The critics: – Risks are very high – Absence of demonstrated disposal technology after 40+ years proves that nuclear power is fundamentally flawed – Irresponsible to generate more waste while the problem remains unsolved • The advocates – ‘High-level waste is a non-risk’File Size: 1MB. Nuclear Waste Maangement Database. (Note: the following is taken from the Argentina National Report to the Joint Convention for ). Since its creation in , the National Atomic Energy Commission (CNEA) of the Argentine Republic has worked in the development of applications for the peaceful use of nuclear energy.


Share this book
You might also like
Animal growth and development

Animal growth and development

Ramu and the kite.

Ramu and the kite.

Voss

Voss

Kenilworths railway age

Kenilworths railway age

Once in Austria

Once in Austria

Electricity and gas tariffs

Electricity and gas tariffs

Crazy men deluxe

Crazy men deluxe

Labor and poverty

Labor and poverty

Historical Atlas of World Mythology, Vol. II: The Way of the Seeded Earth, Part 3: Mythologies of the Primitive Planters

Historical Atlas of World Mythology, Vol. II: The Way of the Seeded Earth, Part 3: Mythologies of the Primitive Planters

Compendium on labor law

Compendium on labor law

Andrew Jackson.

Andrew Jackson.

Interagency Review Group on Nuclear Waste Management by United States. Congress. House. Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs. Subcommittee on Energy and the Environment. Download PDF EPUB FB2

United States. Interagency Review Group on Nuclear Waste Management. Report to the President by the Interagency Review Group on Nuclear Waste Management.

Washington, D.C.: The Group ; Springfield, Va.: Available from National Technical Information Service, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, (OCoLC) Material Type. Get this from a library.

Report of the Interagency Review Group on Nuclear Waste Management: hearings before the Subcommittee on Energy, Nuclear Proliferation, and Federal Services of the Committee on Governmental Affairs, United States Senate, Ninety-sixth Congress, first session, March 13 [United States.

Congress. Senate. Radioactive Waste G. International Programs in Nuclear Waste Management H. Summary of Draft Report A B-1 C D-1 E-1 F G H PREFACE The Draft Report to the President by the Interagency Review Group on Nuclear Waste Management was released for public review and comment Octo It covers technical and regulatory aspects of waste management with discussion questions at the end of each chapter to provide an opportunity to explore the many facets of waste management issues.

An extensive reference list at the end of each chapter retains the references from the first edition of the book and incorporates references used in 3/5(1).

Recent nationwide hearings conducted by the Department of Energy culminated with a report to the President compiled by the Interagency.

Nuclear Waste Management This memorandum summarizes the findings and recommendations of the Interagency Review Group (IRG) on Nuclear Waste Management which you established in March In addition, your decision is requested on two issues (Tabs A and B) which could not be resolved by the Interagency Group.

The safe management of nuclear and radioactive wastes is a subject that has recently received considerable recognition due to the huge volume of accumulative wastes and the increased public awareness of the hazards of these wastes.

This book aims to cover the practice and research efforts that are currently conducted to deal with the technical difficulties in different radioactive.

Suggested Citation:"Nuclear Waste Management."National Academy of Engineering. Outlook for Nuclear Power: Presentations at the Technical Session of the Annual Meeting--November 1,Washington, D.C. The consistency of the overall effort with the recommendations presented in the Report to the President by the Interagency Review Group on Nuclear Waste Management (IRG), as well as with documents representing the national technical consensus, is discussed.}, doi = {/}, journal = {}, number =, volume =, place = {United States.

“Subgroup Report on Alternative Technology Strategies for the Isolation of Nuclear Wastes Interagency Review Group on Nuclear Waste Management,” Draft Report TIDWashington, DC (Oct. Available from NTIS. Google ScholarAuthor: Jerry L. Cohen, Terry L. Steinborn.

On MaMr. Carter formed special interagency review group on nuclear waste management, led by the Energy Department but including skeptics from the Environmental Protection Agency, the. Purchase Nuclear Decommissioning, Waste Management, and Environmental Site Remediation - 1st Edition.

Print Book & E-Book. ISBNHe has reviewed nuclear waste programs for countries around the world. He is a scientific advisor to the Swedish nuclear fuel and waste management program, as well as member of the Geoscience Review Group for Ontario Power Generation's Deep Geologic Repository Project for Low and Intermediate Level Waste.

The book is level-headed, in-depth, and logical Too Hot to Touch [is] more about the fight between politics, science, stupidity and apathy (and bribery). But one of the problems with managing nuclear waste is the scope of the problem.

[It] makes it clear that there are no good solutions to the problem of nuclear waste.'. “ Report to the President by the Interagency Review Group on Nuclear Waste Management,” Washington, D.C., 0399, “Nuclear Waste Management, 9/11/79 [Briefing Book]” Folder, Box“Staff Offices/Office of Staff Secretary/Handwriting File,” 9/10/79 [1] through [9/12/79—Not Submitted—DF], Jimmy Carter Presidential Library Cited by: Yet it had seemed hardly excusable for him to take so long to outline action after the massive report to him by the Interagency Review Group on Nuclear Waste Management.

President Carter's message to Congress on the management of radioactive wastes and the findings and recommendations of the interagency review group on nuclear waste management are included. Selection criteria for the WIPP site including geologic, hydrologic, tectonic, physicochemical compatability, and socio-economic factors are presented.

Group (Review Group) on Nuclear Waste Management. This Review Group made several important contributions, including citing the importance of a “waste form” that would “inhibit the release of radionuclides into.

water” and viewing the packaging of the waste as a way of compensating for “geologic uncertainties.”. Report to the President by the Interagency Review Group on Nuclear Waste Management, TID ().

Google ScholarAuthor: G. Oertel. Nuclear Waste Management, Nuclear Power and Energy Choices: Public Preferences, Perceptions and Trust includes a comprehensive treatment of the theories and literature, and most important is grounded in surveys in, and which includes questions considering the impact of Fukushima on US public by: 8.

63 task force report as a starting point, the President on Maestab- lished an Interagency Review Group (IRG) on nuclear waste management with representatives from 14 Government entities.build consensus on a new comprehensive national nuclear waste policy.

In Marchhe convened the Interagency Review Group on Nuclear Waste Management (IRG), a commission comprising representatives of fourteen federal agencies and chaired by Sec-retary of Energy John M.

Deutch, to report to him within seven months IRG evalu-Cited by: 6.Rare Book & Manuscript Library Nuclear Waste Management.

Box 6 Citizen Participation. Box 6 Interagency Review Group. Box 6 Report TID Box 6 Other Cases. Request Box 7. Box 7 Plutonium Lawsuit, Box 7 Pollard, Robert--Testimony. Box 7 Price.